Talk:Ultimate invasion in UAC

Delete proposal
I accidentally submitted the addition of the delete template without an edit summary, which may be a (one of many) reason(s) why this didn't attract attention. Anyway, this tiny article doesn't need preserving IMHO, for the reasons noted in the template. --Xymph (talk) 02:01, 14 December 2020 (CST)
 * Agreed, got rid of it. I think as a one-liner vanity article for an obviously dead and abandoned project, it could warrant a speedy deletion. --Gez (talk) 06:16, 14 December 2020 (CST)
 * Belatedly agree based on absence of more recent search hits and the idea that, if it were to be released, the existing text would have been of negligible help in fleshing out the article.  Speaking only for myself, I notice deletion tags much sooner if you start a talk thread immediately.  :>
 * As the introduction says, a speedy criterion must always weigh efficiency against the appearance of hierarchical, exclusionary decision-making. We have had vanity submissions for as long as I've been here, and they have often been used as starting points for a more balanced article (or simply left alone because they're comprehensive and add search keywords), so I don't think it's at all an "obvious" class of pages.  FWIW, Ryan W (living fossil) 17:08, 14 December 2020 (CST)